JavaScript är inaktiverat. För en bättre upplevelse, vänligen aktivera JavaScript i din webbläsare innan du fortsätter.

Svara på tråd

Meddelande: <blockquote data-quote="Snapps" data-source="post: 1281971" data-attributes="member: 185634">A well written and pragmatic listing of priorities. I see these also as the low-hanging fruit but obtainable because they are mainly within the efforts of FIS themselves.I would add that event locations that wish to be on the tour schedule need to provide standardized evaluations of their own climate impact to FIS. This would allow a transparent and comparable evaluation and ranking of locations by impact. Allowing the start of a dialog by FIS and locations to push/pressure locations to do better or lose a spot on the tour. Lack of information would lead to removal from the tour schedule once ongoing contracts are concluded.A bit more ambitious but this could optimize and extend FIS own ambitions. It would 1) establish a transparent method for evaluations outside their own organization, 2) set the bar for current in house evaluations, 3) establish a system to evaluate future improvements/developments.</blockquote>